Suzan Lamens vs Selena Janicijevic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W W L L
Form
L L L L L W L L L LHead-2-Head: Lamens 0 - 2 Janicijevic
They have played 5 sets in total, with Lamens winning 1 and Janicijevic winning 4. The last match between Lamens and Janicijevic was at the Grand Est Open 88 - Contrexeville, 11-07-2024, Second, Clay with Selena Janicijevic getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | 0 |
| Selena Janicijevic | 2 |
Grand Est Open 88 - Contrexeville(11-07-2024)
6
4
6
4
| Lamens | Stats | Janicijevic |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (15-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 32% (6-13) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 73 | Ranking | 198 |
| 64 | Highest Rank | 153 |
| 25 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 10 |
| 58% (300-218) | Career Total W/L | 57% (168-125) |
| $426,753 | Career Prize Money | $236,030 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lamens VS Janicijevic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Suzan Lamens
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-4 5-7 6-4 |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Suzan Lamens
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
107)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
Lamens VS Janicijevic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 23 | Games Won | 29 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:7:36 | Average Match Time | 2:7:36 |
| 55% (97/175) | 1st Serve % | 49% (82/168) |
| 55% (53/97) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (55/82) |
| 50% (39/78) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (39/86) |
| 47% (9/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (12/33) |
| 44% (74/168) | Return Points Win % | 47% (83/175) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Selena Janicijevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Selena Janicijevic
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Selena Janicijevic
90%
(
53 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Selena Janicijevic
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Selena Janicijevic
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ylena In-Albon
Player
Selena Janicijevic
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Selena Janicijevic
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hina Inoue
Player
Selena Janicijevic
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mary Stoiana
Player
Selena Janicijevic
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Selena Janicijevic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (300/218) | Win/Loss | 57% (168/125) |
| 56% (664/521) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (378/291) |
| 53% (5717/5072) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3213/2784) |
| 54% (80/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (21/18) |
| 61% (187/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (134/86) |
| 57% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39% (12/19) |
| 14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 845 | Aces Total | 437 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2447 | Total Double Faults | 856 |
| 1:29:15 | Average Match Time | 1:44:27 |
| 428.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 320.95 |
| 59% (18268/31021) | 1st Serve % | 61% (11933/19625) |
| 62% (11281/18221) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7340/11933) |
| 43% (5469/12825) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3501/7691) |
| 51% (2100/4135) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1272/2558) |
| 48% (14961/31166) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9058/19098) |
| 25% (3/9) | Slam W/L | 38% (8/13) |
| 40% (4/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (27/23) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (166/101) | Challenger W/L | 56% (112/89) |
| 54% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 71% (41/17) |
| 58% (297/514) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (166/289) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (48/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (20/51) |
| 56% (85/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (42/83) |
| 91% (274/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (164/141) |
| 9% (274/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (164/23) |
| 21% (244/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (129/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
